Brief · facilities
Online and AI booking in dental clinics in 12 Asia-Pacific and Gulf markets: what clinic websites offer, and what holds adoption back
Dental Market Radar Editorial Team · Published · Updated
No official statistic or independent study in any of the 12 markets states what share of dental clinics lets patients book online or uses AI for patient contact. We sampled 150 clinics at random in each of Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia and read their websites.
AI-assisted: written with an AI desk and credited to the editorial team. Approved for publication. See editorial policy.
Countries: Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar
Cite this
Dental Market Radar Editorial Team. (2026). Online and AI booking in dental clinics in 12 Asia-Pacific and Gulf markets: what clinic websites offer, and what holds adoption back. Dental Market Radar. https://dentalmarketradar.com/briefs/dental-clinic-online-ai-booking-12-markets/
Permanent URL: https://dentalmarketradar.com/briefs/dental-clinic-online-ai-booking-12-markets/. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Key points
- No official statistic or independent study in any of the 12 markets states what share of dental clinics lets patients book online or uses AI for patient contact. We sampled 150 clinics at random in each of Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia and read their websites.
- Real-time online booking, with the slot picker seen: Japan 6 of 150 sampled clinics, 4.0% (95% CI 1.8–8.5%); Taiwan and Malaysia 0 of 150 (0–2.5%). Counting every link to a booking system as an upper bound: Japan 20.0%, Taiwan 1.3%, Malaysia 0.7%.
- Booking by messaging app is the common online channel outside Japan: WhatsApp in Malaysia 18.0% of sampled clinics (12.7–24.9%), LINE in Taiwan 4.7% and Japan 6.0%.
- AI claimed for patient contact: 1 of 450 sampled clinic websites (a Japanese clinic announcing a trial of AI voice for phone calls). No sampled site showed a chat widget.
- Australia, self-reported: 12% of 414 surveyed dental practices said they use AI for appointment scheduling, and 40% would not consider it (CommBank and ADA survey, late 2023).
More findings
- Documented barriers are rules more than surveys: medical advertising rules apply to clinic websites in every market where we found primary text; health data counts as sensitive data under privacy law; Japan has allowed clinics to charge a booking-system fee since 1 June 2026.
TL;DR
- No official statistic or independent study states what share of dental clinics lets patients book online or uses AI for patient contact, in any of the 12 markets. Searches in English and local languages return booking-software adverts, vendor analyses and surveys, and clinic pages. [4]
- So we counted. We reused three simple random samples of 150 clinics each, drawn from official lists in Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia, and read each clinic's own website on 10 November 2026. We looked for real-time booking, online request forms, booking by messaging app, chat widgets and AI claims. [1][2][3][4]
- Real-time online booking (B2), slot picker seen: Japan 6 of 150 clinics, 4.0% (95% CI 1.8–8.5%); Taiwan 0 of 150 and Malaysia 0 of 150 (0–2.5%). Every clinic link to a booking system, counted as an upper bound: Japan 30 of 150 (20.0%), Taiwan 2 (1.3%), Malaysia 1 (0.7%). [1][2][3][4]
- AI claimed for patient contact (A1 + A2): 1 of 450 sampled clinic websites, a Japanese clinic announcing a trial of AI voice answering for phone calls. No sampled site showed a chat widget. [4]
- What holds adoption back, by the evidence found: clinic websites fall under medical advertising rules; health details typed into a booking form or chat are sensitive data under privacy law; in Japan, the national standard for linking booking tools to clinical software does not yet cover free-slot queries, and from 1 June 2026 clinics may charge patients a booking-system fee. Staff, trust and cost evidence exists for Australia and, partly, Japan only. [9][10][11][12][19][20][5][6]
Booking on clinic websites (advertised)
Definitions. B2 real-time online booking: the patient picks a live slot online. B1 online request: the patient asks for a slot and the clinic confirms later; booking systems that take only a provisional booking confirmed by phone are B1. M1 messaging booking: the clinic's site invites booking through LINE, WhatsApp or similar. [4]
Real-time online booking (B2)
| Market | Sampling frame | B2-seen: slot picker seen (share of all 150, 95% CI) | Upper bound: B2-seen + booking-system link (share of all 150, 95% CI) | Clinics with a readable own web presence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | MHLW 医療情報ネット open data, 54,637 dental clinics (June 2026) [1][4] | 6; 4.0% (1.8–8.5%) | 30; 20.0% (14.4–27.1%) | 89 |
| Taiwan | NHIA contracted dental clinics, 6,998 active (November 2026) [2][4] | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) | 2; 1.3% (0.4–4.7%) | 26 |
| Malaysia | MOH list of private dental clinics registered as of 30 June 2022, 3,259 entries [3][4] | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) | 1; 0.7% (0.1–3.7%) | 51 |
- B2-seen means we saw a calendar of dates or times with availability marks on a booking page that robots.txt allowed, without clicking into the booking flow. It is a lower bound: login walls, a menu step before the calendar, and booking hosts whose robots.txt we could not read all stay unconfirmed. [4]
- The upper bound adds every clinic whose booking button links to a booking system. A link is not proof of live slots: one Taiwanese clinic's link led to a page saying online booking is not open. Two Japanese booking systems state on their own page that the booking is provisional and confirmed by phone; those clinics are counted as B1, not B2. [4]
- Share of readable sites: Japan 6 of 89 (6.7%, 3.1–13.9%) seen, 30 of 89 (33.7%, 24.7–44.0%) upper bound; Taiwan 0 of 26 seen, 2 of 26 upper bound; Malaysia 0 of 51 seen, 1 of 51 upper bound. [1][2][3][4]
- Booking-system hosts are not named here. Sixteen different booking hosts appear on the 30 Japanese B2 sites; none covers more than 5 of them. [4]
- Contracted, for comparison: one Japanese dental booking and practice-management system publishes a customer count equal to 5.9% of clinics (October 2026), reported in our brief on booking platforms. A contracted count and an advertised share measure different things and are not compared as equal. [35]
Other online channels
| Market | Online request form (B1), share of all 150 (95% CI) | Booking by messaging app (M1), share of all 150 (95% CI) | Any online channel (B1, B2 or M1), share of all 150 (95% CI) | Phone or walk-in only, share of readable sites (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan [1][4] | 8; 5.3% (2.7–10.2%) | 9, all LINE; 6.0% (3.2–11.0%) | 39; 26.0% (19.6–33.6%) | 50 of 89; 56.2% (45.8–66.0%) |
| Taiwan [2][4] | 7; 4.7% (2.3–9.3%) | 7, all LINE; 4.7% (2.3–9.3%) | 11; 7.3% (4.1–12.7%) | 15 of 26; 57.7% (38.9–74.5%) |
| Malaysia [3][4] | 16; 10.7% (6.7–16.6%) | 27, all WhatsApp; 18.0% (12.7–24.9%) | 39; 26.0% (19.6–33.6%) | 12 of 51; 23.5% (14.0–36.8%) |
- Taiwan's low all-clinic shares mostly reflect missing websites: 99 of 150 sampled clinics had no own web presence we could find, and 22 more had only Facebook or Instagram pages, which robots.txt closes to crawlers. Among the 26 readable sites, 11 offered an online channel (42.3%, 25.5–61.1%). [2][4]
- Malaysia: among the 51 readable sites, 39 offered an online channel (76.5%, 63.2–86.0%), most often a WhatsApp link worded for booking. The figures describe private clinics on the 2022 register, not all clinics in Malaysia. [3][4]
Chat and AI for patient contact
| Market | Chat widget (C1), share of all 150 (95% CI) | AI claimed (A1 chat/booking or A2 phone), share of all 150 (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Japan [1][4] | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) | 1; 0.7% (0.1–3.7%) |
| Taiwan [2][4] | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) |
| Malaysia [3][4] | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) | 0; 0.0% (0.0–2.5%) |
- The one AI claim is a news item on a Japanese clinic's home page announcing a trial of telephone handling by AI automated voice ("AIの自動音声による電話対応の試験運用"); the site does not say whether the trial continues. [4]
- A1 needs the clinic's own words. "AI" used for diagnosis, scanners or aligners does not count, and neither does a chat script with no AI claim. No chat-vendor script host was found in the HTML of the 166 readable sites; chats that load only after a click or through a tag manager would not show up. [4]
Survey figures on AI and booking software (used, self-reported)
| Market | Figure | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12% of surveyed practices "currently using" AI for appointment scheduling; 40% "would not consider using"; 2% using AI for FAQs and queries (fieldwork late 2023) [5] | 414 decision-makers at dental practices, contacts supplied by the Australian Dental Association; not a random sample; the survey does not say whether the AI faces patients |
| Australia | 20% of practices used "online directories and booking services" to attract patients in 2023, down from 23% in 2022 [5] | One combined marketing category; not real-time booking |
| Australia (patients) | 19% name the practice website as their first-choice way to book a dentist, against 41% for the telephone (October 2023) [6] | 1,127 online respondents; preference, not clinic adoption |
| Japan | 36.7% of 152 responding dentists have appointment-management software (June 2025) [7] | Opt-in members of a dental media site; software may be internal only, not patient-facing |
| Korea | 6.6% of 18,240 dental clinics had a working website registered with HIRA (2020 data) [8] | Web presence, not booking; clinics using portal or blog pages are not counted |
What holds adoption back
Barrier evidence was collected per market and class, from primary sources only: law or regulator text on an official portal, regulator guidance, or the survey's own publisher. Where nothing primary was found the cell says so. [4]
| Market | (a) Software integration | (b) Insurance and booking rules | (c) Advertising rules | (d) Privacy and health data | (e) Staff and workflow | (f) Patient trust | (g) Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan [4] | National API guide for booking tools covers check-in only, not free-slot queries; medical clinics, not dental [11] | Booking-system fee allowed from 1 June 2026; no-show fee only under the booked-consultation scheme, with prior consent [9] | Clinic websites are regulated as advertising; booking hours and booking URLs may be shown [10] | Medical history is special-care data; prior consent needed [12] | Tokyo 2024 survey: too busy, too few staff to adopt clinic software (electronic records) [13] | No primary evidence found | Cost is the most-cited software criterion, named by 61.8% of 152 dentists (opt-in) [7] |
| Korea [4] | No primary evidence found | Ban on profit-motivated patient brokering and inducement [14] | Testimonial and comparative ads banned; prior review for ads in designated internet media and apps [14] | Health data is sensitive; separate consent needed [15] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Taiwan [4] | No primary evidence found | Registration fees are set by each clinic, not by the authority [18] | Ad content limited by law; clinic web information governed by separate rules and the false-claims ban [16] | Medical data may be collected only on listed bases such as written consent [17] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Singapore [4] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | Internet and apps permitted; pushed promotional messages need prior consent; reviews and testimonials restricted [28] | Appointment reminders are treated apart from marketing messages; AI guidelines address clinics as deployers [29][30] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Malaysia [4] | One clinic queue system states an open booking API [34] | Public dental check-ups are booked through the government MySejahtera service [33] | Websites and apps allowed; messaging-app outreach needs prior consent [31] | Health data is sensitive; explicit consent needed [32] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Thailand [4] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found (law text found only on non-official hosts) | No primary evidence found (law text found only on non-official hosts) | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Vietnam [4] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found (decree text found only on a private legal database) | No primary evidence found (law summary found only on a provincial explainer) | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Australia [4] | One practice system publishes a free-slot API; another limits its API to existing partners [22][23] | No primary evidence found | Testimonials banned in advertising, including on booking sites [19] | Every practice holding health information is covered regardless of size; AI recording needs consent [20][21] | 68% of surveyed practices say access to skilled staff limits capacity (2023) [5] | 64% of patients worry about data breaches; 20% uncomfortable with AI-supported scheduling [6] | One booking platform charges $65 per new patient booked [24] |
| New Zealand [4] | Same two practice systems as Australia [22][23] | No primary evidence found | Testimonials need written permission and verification [25] | Health Information Privacy Code applies; regulator expects an impact assessment before AI tools [26][27] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Saudi Arabia [4] | No primary evidence found | MOH Sehhaty app takes and reschedules bookings for public primary care centres [36] | Practitioners may not advertise themselves except as the implementing regulation allows [37] | Health data is sensitive data; the regulations set extra controls for processing it [38] | No primary evidence found | Older adults in Jazan who had never booked online cited poor digital skills, unreliable internet, little family support and distrust (qualitative, 27 people) [39]; ease of contacting the dental clinic had the lowest patient satisfaction score, 54.2%, in MOH clinics [40] | No primary evidence found |
| UAE [4] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | Dubai: facility social-media accounts must show the medical advertisement licence number [41]; federal fine of AED 100,000–200,000 for unlicensed health advertising through the system [42] | Health data from UAE services may not be stored or transferred abroad except as decided by the health authority [42]; Dubai requires AI solutions to disclose which functions are AI-enabled [43] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
| Qatar [4] | No primary evidence found | Hamad dentistry asks patients to start with a primary health centre dentist for an initial assessment [44] | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found (law text found only as an unofficial translation) | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found | No primary evidence found |
- Japan, booking fees. A March 2026 notice lists, among charges not covered by insurance, "system-use fees for booking or online consultation" and a cancellation fee for patient-initiated cancellations just before a booked consultation, the latter only where the clinic runs the booked-consultation scheme and has explained the fee in advance. It applies from 1 June 2026. [9]
- Japan, integration. The national API guide for linking clinical software with "booking, intake questionnaires, speech recognition, AI document generation" covers only check-in status in its 2026 version; "free-slot queries" are not covered, and the clinic specification it belongs to excludes dental. [11]
- Australia, attitudes. In the same practice survey, 48% would like to use AI for appointment scheduling in future and 40% would not consider it; the report does not ask why. Among patients, 53% are comfortable with AI supporting appointment scheduling. [5][6]
- Saudi Arabia, patients. The Jazan study interviewed people aged 60 or over who had not used online dental booking, so its finding that none had completed a booking is partly by design; its value is the list of barriers they described. The MOH satisfaction study scored ease of contacting the dental clinic at 2.71 of 5. [39][40]
- UAE, data location. Federal Law No. 2 of 2019 bars storing or transferring health data from UAE services abroad unless the health authority decides otherwise, which bears on cloud booking, chat and AI tools hosted outside the country. [42]
- Rules describe, they do not forbid booking. None of the advertising or privacy texts above bans online or AI booking; they govern what a clinic site may say and how health details may be collected. This brief describes the texts and gives no legal advice. [10][12][14][19][20]
Market by market
| Market | Clinic share with online booking | Clinic share with AI patient contact | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | Sampled: B2-seen 0%; any online channel 7.3% | Sampled: 0% | Two-thirds of sampled clinics have no own website [2][4] |
| Japan | Sampled: B2-seen 4.0%, upper bound 20.0% | Sampled: 0.7% (one trial) | Official clinic list with homepage field; survey data on software is opt-in [1][4][7] |
| Korea | null | null | Only a 2020 website-presence figure; no clinic list we could sample [8][4] |
| Singapore | null | null | No clinic list we may use; data.gov.sg holds counts only [4] |
| Malaysia | Sampled: B2-seen 0%; WhatsApp booking 18.0% | Sampled: 0% | 2022 register of private clinics [3][4] |
| Thailand | null | null | Public-hospital booking runs through a ministry app; no count on pages robots.txt allows [4] |
| Vietnam | null | null | No clinic list; no survey found [4] |
| Australia | null; practice survey only | 12% of surveyed practices use AI for scheduling (self-reported) | No usable practice list; data.gov.au closes all paths to crawlers [5][4] |
| New Zealand | null | null | No practice list; no survey on booking channels found [4] |
| Saudi Arabia | null | null | No public list of private clinics; the MOH Sehhaty app reported more than 11 million appointments across all services by February 2023, with no dental split [46][4] |
| UAE | null | null | No public national clinic list; the only vendor count found is undated and covers all specialties [4] |
| Qatar | null | null | Public dental clinics (PHCC, 2025): 60% walk-in patients, 36% appointment no-show rate, 16 days' appointment wait; no booking-channel split [45] |
Method
- Samples. We reused the T3 simple random samples of 150 clinics per market (seed 20261109) from MHLW 医療情報ネット (Japan, 54,637 dental clinics), NHIA contracted clinics (Taiwan, 6,998) and the MOH Act 586 register (Malaysia, 3,259 private clinics, June 2022), with the web presence T3 found. Every site was fetched again on 10 November 2026 and coded afresh. At n = 150 the margin of error is at most ±8 percentage points; intervals are Wilson 95% intervals. [1][2][3][4]
- No frame for other markets. Singapore, Australia and Saudi Arabia were looked at again for an official clinic list we may read; none qualified. [4]
- Reading sites. Home page plus up to four linked booking, contact, access or first-visit pages; robots.txt checked before every URL; one request every 3 seconds per host; script and iframe hosts read from the HTML, never run. No logins, no forms, no bookings, no bot walls bypassed. Only the website address, codes, a short verbatim phrase, hosts and the date were stored. [4]
- B2 verification. For every real-time booking code the lead opened the linked booking page, view-only, after a robots.txt check, and recorded whether a slot picker was visible. [4]
- Blind re-code. A second coder re-coded 39 sites (20% of each market's readable sites, at least 10) without seeing the first codes. Japan agreed on every code in all 18; Taiwan 9 of 10 on B2 and all others; Malaysia 10 of 11 on M1 and all others. Both differences were settled under the written rules and change no headline figure. [4]
- Search recall. "No website found" rests on T3's two logged searches per clinic; T3's test found 8 of 10 known sites in Japan, 10 of 10 in Taiwan and 7 of 10 in Malaysia, so all-clinic shares may be slightly low. [4]
What cannot be measured, and why
- Booking that clinics do not show on their own site, such as a portal listing the clinic does not link to. Portal listings are counted separately in T2. [35]
- Booking actually used by patients. No market publishes clinic-level booking volumes by channel.
- Chat or AI tools that load only after user interaction. We read HTML and did not run scripts.
- Clinic lists we may not use, for the reasons in the market table. [4]
Gaps
- An AI-assistant probe of this question was not run, as in T2, T3 and T4. [4]
- The coded samples (without clinic names), robots.txt logs, barrier records with verbatim quotes and the B2 verification log are kept by the editorial team and are available on request. [4]
AI-assisted. Prepared by the Dental Market Radar Editorial Team from public sources and a website sample read on 2026-11-10.
Source links
Numbers in square brackets in the text link to this list.
- 医療情報ネット オープンデータ 歯科診療所 施設票 (MHLW, 2026-06-01) (accessed 2026-11-09)
- 健保特約醫事機構-診所 (NHIA open data, data.gov.tw 39283) (accessed 2026-11-09)
- Senarai Klinik Pergigian Swasta yang berdaftar di bawah Akta 586 as of 30 Jun 2022 (MOH Malaysia) (accessed 2026-11-09)
- Dental Market Radar Editorial Team, T1 website sample of 450 dental clinic websites in Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia, read 2026-11-10, with gap check and barrier records; sampling, coding and checks are described in the Method section of this brief and on the methodology page (accessed 2026-11-10)
- CommBank Dental Insights Report 2024 (Commonwealth Bank of Australia with the Australian Dental Association) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- CommBank Patient Experience Insights Report 2024 (Commonwealth Bank of Australia) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 歯科医院におけるソフトウェア導入状況 (Dentwave member survey, June 2025) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Factors Associated with Website Operation among Small Hospitals and Medical and Dental Clinics in Korea (Healthc Inform Res 2022;28(4):355-363) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 「療養の給付と直接関係ないサービス等の取扱いについて」の一部改正について（保医発0327第７号, MHLW, 2026-03-27) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 医療広告等ガイドライン (MHLW, last amended 2026-03-30) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 電子カルテ及びレセプトコンピュータ 標準仕様書 第１章別紙６ 業務効率化サービス API 実装ガイド（令和８年暫定版） (MHLW and Digital Agency) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 個人情報の保護に関する法律 (e-Gov法令検索) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 令和６年医療機関向けアンケート調査について（資料９） (Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Public Health) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 의료법 (Medical Service Act, in force 2026-10-02; 국가법령정보센터) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 개인정보 보호법 (Personal Information Protection Act, in force 2026-09-11; 국가법령정보센터) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 醫療法 (全國法規資料庫, amended 2026-09-23) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 個人資料保護法 (全國法規資料庫) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- 回診看檢查報告，掛號費收取問題 (Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2009-09-29) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service (Ahpra and National Boards) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Privacy Act 1988, Compilation No. 104 (Federal Register of Legislation) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Meeting your professional obligations when using Artificial Intelligence in healthcare (Ahpra and National Boards) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Dentally API developer documentation (Henry Schein One) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- EXACT API v1.0 documentation (Software of Excellence, Henry Schein One) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- HotDoc for dental practices (pricing page) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Advertising practice standard (Dental Council of New Zealand, 1 September 2020) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Health Information Privacy Code fact sheet 1: Overview (Office of the Privacy Commissioner, NZ) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Artificial intelligence and the Information Privacy Principles (Office of the Privacy Commissioner, NZ) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Healthcare Services (Advertisement) Regulations 2021 (Singapore Statutes Online) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Advisory Guidelines for the Healthcare Sector, revised 20 September 2023 (PDPC Singapore) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (AIHGle 2.0) (Ministry of Health Singapore) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Guidelines and Provisions for Public Information, 4th edition, endorsed 14 March 2022, in force 1 July 2022 (Malaysian Dental Council); listed on the MDC guidelines page (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Act 709), Malay and English text (Personal Data Protection Department) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Application for Booking an Appointment for Health Check (MySejahtera), MyGOV portal (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Qmed features (QueueMed Healthtech) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Online booking platforms for dental clinics in 12 Asia-Pacific and Gulf markets (Dental Market Radar brief) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- (الصحة) تتيح جدولة وإلغاء المواعيد في تطبيق (صحتي) (Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia, July 2022) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions (Royal Decree M/59, 1426H) and implementing regulation, English translation (Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree M/19, amended M/148), English text V2, 23 April 2023 (SDAIA) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Perceptions of Online Dental Appointment Booking and Barriers to Its Adoption Among Older Adults: A Qualitative Study in the Jazan Region of Saudi Arabia (Dentistry Journal 2026; doi 10.3390/dj14110708; abstract via Crossref) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Patient Satisfaction in Dental Healthcare Settings at Saudi Ministry of Health: A Descriptive Study (Patient Preference and Adherence; doi 10.2147/PPA.S419978; abstract via Europe PMC) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Standards for Medical Advertisement Content on Social Media, DHA/HRS/HPSD/ST-21, Issue 1.1 (Dubai Health Authority, 2022) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Federal Law No. (2) of 2019 on the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Healthcare (text published by the Dubai Health Authority) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Artificial Intelligence in the Healthcare, Policy DHA/HISHD/PP-09 (Dubai Health Authority) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- Hamad Dentistry: Patient Information (Hamad Medical Corporation) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- PHCC Annual Statistical Report 2025 (Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar) (accessed 2026-11-10)
- MOH news, 8 February 2023: Sehhaty application figures (Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia) (accessed 2026-11-10)